According to directive 2219, supervisors may not recommend formal disciplinary charges against a probationary employee for what reason?

The rationale behind not allowing supervisors to recommend formal disciplinary charges against a probationary employee for a violation of department rules is rooted in the understanding of the probationary period itself. During this time, the organization aims to assess the overall suitability of new employees.

A probationary employee is essentially undergoing a trial phase where their performance and behavior are being evaluated. If a violation of the department rules occurs, the department may prefer to address such issues in a more formative way rather than progressing directly to formal disciplinary actions. This approach allows for correction and guidance rather than jumping to punitive measures, which can impact the employee's chance of being successful in their new role.

Therefore, while there are serious implications for violating department rules, the directive encourages supervisors to focus on improvement and support rather than formal charges during the probationary period.